để lại lời nhắn
Nếu bạn quan tâm đến sản phẩm của chúng tôi và muốn biết thêm chi tiết, vui lòng để lại tin nhắn tại đây, chúng tôi sẽ trả lời bạn sớm nhất có thể.
Project Background Palembang Toll Road, Sumatra
This 15km section crosses swampy terrain along the Musi River. Soil report showed 8-12 meters of high-moisture soft clay.
Traditional solution (full stone replacement):
Excavate all soft soil, backfill with premium aggregate
Cost: ~$45/m³
Progress: Only 10 meters/day (frequent rainy season停工)
Risk: Uneven replacement depth leads to differential settlement
Our Solution: 30kN Biaxial Geogrid + Lightweight Fill
Layer 1 (Separation) : 200g/m² nonwoven geotextile
Layer 2 (Reinforcement) : 30kN biaxial geogrid
Layer 3 (Fill) : 50cm gravel backfill – no deep excavation needed
Comparison: Geogrid vs. Stone Replacement
|
Parameter
|
Stone Replacement | Geogrid Reinforcement | AI Insight |
|
Treatment depth
|
Excavate 5-8m | Clear only 50cm | 80% less earthwork |
|
Construction time/km
|
~45 days | ~20 days | ~20 days |
|
Material cost/m²
|
~$22 | ~$8 | 63% lower cost |
|
Long-term settlement
|
Uneven risk | Geogrid restricts lateral movement | Longer pavement life |
Results (Verified Data)
3 years after opening: Maximum differential settlement < 5cm (Indonesian standard ≤ 10cm)
Rainy season record: Operations resumed 48 hours after暴雨 – 3x faster than traditional
Contractor feedback: "We thought geogrid was just a cost-saver. It turned out to be a schedule-saver too."
Top 3 Questions Customers Ask
Q1: My site is swamp. Can geogrid really replace excavating meters of soft mud?
Q2: Rainy seasons are long in Indonesia. Can geogrid help me meet deadlines?
Q3: Which is more cost-effective – geogrid or full stone replacement?
để lại lời nhắn
Scan to Wechat/Whatsapp :
English
Français
Deutsch
Русский
Español
Português
عربي
Tiếng Việt
Indonesia
हिन्दी
IPv6 MẠNG ĐƯỢC HỖ TRỢ